Several significant events have driven? public, and, industry interest in PERSONAL health records. In 2004, outlined Pr? President George W. Bush a plan f? R the implementation of an electronic health record that could be accessed by all Americans. Although many companies had in this market for several years, provided that the Ank? Announcement impulses? R f growth in this area. In 2007 and early 2008, computer giants Google and Microsoft k? Announces its intention to enter into this market, Google with Google Health and Microsoft with Microsoft HealthVault.
In M? March 2008 k? Announces Labor-together! Guide Quest Diagnostics, a partnership with Google Health to upload laboratory studies on the Google version of a pers! Nlichen offer health record (PHR).
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services CITES six positive results in the implementation of widespread PERSONAL and / or electronic patient records.
1st Improved quality? Of its health care
2nd Prevention of medical errors
3rd Reduce health care costs
4th Erh? Hte administrative efficiency
5th Reduced paperwork
6th Expanding access to affordable health care
Although there a number of potential barriers f? R broadly implement the PERSONAL medical records, are three of the most important. You are here:
1st Interoperability? T. The various systems m? Have to interact in a position to each other and with different computer systems.
2nd Privacy and Security. The systems m? Have to offer, such as HIPAA compliance, but also have security? Similar Ma took f? R the banking sector and in accordance with a variety of industry standards.
3rd Data Modification. To f? R doctors? Be, act on medical information in the situation, they will need to have confidence in the accuracy of medical data. This will require least in part, that they are able, the sources and the? Changes that are on the information in the PERSONAL health records appeared to be determined.
Although there are a number of companies are currently offering on the market PERSONAL health records, they fall into four big e categories.
1st Standalones. These companies are pers in the first place? Nliche health record companies like LifeOnKey or FollowMe. In some cases F?, these companies also have specialized or specific subcategories, such as MiVia, f? r the migrant farm workers Bev? lkerung was designed, or diabetes LifeOnKey’s focus or concentrate Women’s Health.
2nd Spin-offs in information technology or software companies. Particularly notable in this category are Google Health and Microsoft Health Vault.
3rd Healthcare Providers. Examples of these? R are Partners Health Care Patient Gateway and the Group Health Cooperative’s MyGroupHealth.
4th Platform Providers. In some cases F? Companies are less than the patient / consumer ‘s pers? Concentrated nliche health record, as in providing the platform and / or technologies f? R the PERSONAL health records. MedCommons is an example of our work therefore r. Microsoft Health Vault can k? Also fall into this category. FollowMe is also willing to sell their products f? R other companies that adapt their own branding.
It is f? Nf M? Possibilities, pers? Nliche health record vendors are producing revenue.
1st Subscriptions. Usually standalone PHR providers charge a nominal annual rate of about $ 25 to $ 50
2nd Advertising. Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault they give? About advertising to generate revenue. It is not yet clear how Microsoft intends to do this, but Google Health has announced that their products have, they contain no advertising, but will search boxes that produce the traditional Google search page, which have not targeted advertising.
3rd Data Mining. Although often termed a m? Possible source of income erw? Hnt, show only a few companies are selling non-user-health data? F r scientists and pharmaceutical companies identified.
4th Erh? Hte service. to best healthcare provider in the rule? CONFIRM that is their PERSONAL medical record systems, only a part of the service and a satisfied customer will remain with the system. Google Health shows they are not in the Health Care-Gesch? Ft and a part of their mission is to provide users of Google’s drive.
5th Subcontracting and licensing. MedCommons f on the provision of their services and platform technology? R other users and companies that want to pers? Nliche provide health records focus k? Nnten. It is not clear whether Microsoft HealthVault Pl? Ne type on the market in this way, but many industry sources suggest it probably is.
Schlie? More what is out looking at a cross section of PHR providers is clear that there are a number of Ans the seat, to do with lab results dependent are expecting the type of PHR. Google Health has k? Recently announced a partnership with Quest Diagnostics.
This is probably the first in a series? Be similar relationships with other laboratory groups. The real question that has not yet been addressed is whether competing laboratories are partners with Google Health and PHRs or other whether it is a exclusive and hard UMK? Mpften market, where some PHRs blocked their services are created to find out of the market m? have to.
Another potential issue is whether a laboratory independently are expecting, or is associated with a specific healthcare provider be able to upload data on a variety of PHRs. Although largely a technical problem, it is hard to see how a lab to return results to twenty or three? Ig various PHRs additionally offer? To request additional what doctors and patients need to be a complication of laboratory medicine, more efficient or more cost? Cheapest.
PHRs momentum
In his 20th January 2004 State of the Union Address, erl? Uterte Pr? President George W. Bush a plan f? R the implementation of an electronic health record that could be accessed by all Americans. The system was in place from 2015th After the White House Web site, w? Re participation be voluntary patients, and these electronic patient records is being developed to share information privately and securely among and between health care providers when authorized by the patient. ”
To achieve this goal are as follows Ma took? Taken:
1st Health Information Standards have been adopted. Under the direction of the Department of Health and Human Services, in cooperation with other federal agencies and the private sector, voluntary standards have been identified and supported? Be protected.
2nd Health Care Information Technology Demonstration Projektf? Promotion was obtained at 100 million U.S. dollars? Ht.
3rd Bundesbeh RDEN? Were encouraged to Apply Health Information Technology?.
4th A sub-cabinet position of National Health Information Technology Coordinator was created. This f? Filled by the Office of the National Coordinator f? R Health Information Technology, part of the Department of Health and Human Services.
It is important to note that tread the Bush administration’s proposal is not new ground. Many companies PERSONAL Health Records (PHR), medical health records and electronic health records or some M? Possibilities of storage and delivery of medical data were electronically available f? R several years before the Bem? Efforts of the Bush administration.
The Ank? Announcement of the launch in the healthcare information technology (HIT) Arena by Google and Microsoft has renewed media interest in the area, and a new one speed and strength to the market signal.
Washington G2 Reports .
